Skip to main content

Orientation 2

Naikan In Four Movements

This four-part Naikan series grew out of a course I offered at Baltimore Dharma Group in Spring 2025. While Naikan is often framed as a tool for self-reflection, I came to see it as something more relational: not a system of correction, but a practice of returning—again and again—to what holds us, what flows through us, what we leave behind, and what we remain with.

Orientation 3

Threadwork

Here, in language, is the closest I have come to tracing the patterns I live inside — and the patterns I see others living inside, too. ...That, to me, is the heart of this offering: not to win empathy through performance, but to make coherence inhabitable — even when the pattern isn't matched. These pieces are not arguments. They do not aim to persuade. They exist to demonstrate — without explanation. To resonate — without claiming universality. To name the cost of asymmetry — without blaming the other. To hold clarity — without self-erasure.

Orientation 4

Holding Vow Sutra: An Introduction

Introduction and Intention:  This is a sutra, but not a sutra in the traditional sense. It is not part of the Buddhist canon, nor is it offered from a seat of transmission or formal authority. It is, rather, a thread — woven from lived practice, shaped by fidelity, and rooted in a vow that did not begin with me and does not end with me.

Featured

The Autistic Mode: A Way Of Thinking

We all have moments of deep concentration—those times when we are so absorbed in something that the world recedes. A musician practicing alone, refining a passage with exquisite focus. A philosopher turning an argument over in their mind, testing its weight from every angle. A scientist working through the layers of an equation, adjusting variables, refining the logic until it holds. In these moments, the noise of the world fades, and what remains is a kind of clarity, a steady presence of thought moving toward resolution.

Featured

Threshold to Threadwork

Introduction: There are two doors into this work. The one below meets the moment. It is written in accessible language—for those seeking clarity about autistic experience, and especially about how it differs in rhythm, in structure, and in the invisible labor it asks of those who must translate themselves to be understood. But this isn’t the only way in. There is another door—quieter, less translated, more interior. If you're looking not just for insight, but for shape—if you’ve ever sensed that what goes unspoken is sometimes the most coherent thing there is—you may find yourself at home there.

Featured

Musings from the Meta-Verse: Tip of the Iceberg Cosmologies

Before you begin: please take a moment, settle in, enjoy the image above—of me holding my baby daughter as a first-time dad, tune into the frequency of restful wonder. Now allow your mind to wander outward from the edges of that image: to the room, to the street outside, to the vast sky beyond the vast sky. Further—past the solar system, past the galaxy’s edge, past everything known—to the edge of the cosmos. And then…

Featured

Woven

I never stopped making art. I just didn’t always call it that. What I made with you, my loves — in those days we shared — was the most embodied form of relational creation. Art was us — there was no interruption. Something Luu Li and and I talked about yesterday landed deeply. She said, “Wow Papa, 54 years! I'm so glad you’re starting to do art again.” And I told her — honestly — it’s never left me. But after that, I found myself thinking: when I was homeschooling Luu Li and CT, I wasn’t just not doing art — I was expressing my creativity through my life with them.

What Flows Without Return

Preface to Naikan Class 2 This reflection is part of a four-part series titled Naikan in Four Movements, which explores the arc of relational practice through receiving, giving, harm, and vow. While they draw from Naikan's framework, they also reach beyond it — rooting the practice more deeply in Zen, where giver, receiver, and gift are not separate. The meal chant points to something subtler than the symbolism of oneness: giving and receiving unfolding freely, without collapsing into unity, acknowledgment, or mutuality. I offer them here as a way to open the field a little wider, supporting your own reflections on giving, receiving, and the life that holds us all. With bows, Dōmon 道門 Luu Pham 2025

The Tree and Clean Giving
When we think of giving, we often think of visible acts — offering help, showing up, saying kind words, doing for others. In everyday life, giving is often understood as part of a relational flow where actions are seen, acknowledged, and met in return. But Naikan asks us to widen this view. There is a form of giving that is less visible, less bound by expectation, and not dependent on response. You might call it the gift of presence. A tree gives fruit, shade, and shelter without needing to be seen giving. It does not withdraw its shade because the birds do not thank it. It gives because it is what it is. It gives as part of the larger field of life — not for recognition, but because its giving arises naturally from its place in the world. This is clean giving. “Clean” as in not tangled in self-image or social performance. Not driven by a need to maintain mutuality or secure belonging. Simply flowing within the larger field of interbeing. In our reflections this week on “What did I give?”, we can begin to notice these quiet forms of giving that often go unrecognized, even by ourselves. Moments of holding back when speaking might cause harm. Offering space rather than filling it. Not imposing our presence when it would constrict the space others need to move in their own rhythm. The giving of allowing things to be as they are. These are forms of giving, too. They do not demand reciprocity. They do not always feel mutual. And yet they are deeply nourishing—both to others and to the field itself. Recently, I realized that by staying away from a family event and taking care of myself, rather than pushing myself into the narrower field of mutuality, I was giving. I was respecting my own limits and also allowing others to be in their own rhythms without the invisible burden of my discomfort or efforting. This was not avoidance or laziness. It was a form of care — spacious and clean — for myself, for them, and for the larger relational field that can hold us without needing to be constantly reinforced by interaction. It was an act of trust: that connection does not disappear simply because I step back. It often feels counterintuitive to me. There are moments when I worry that stepping back will be seen as rejection or neglect — and sometimes, inside myself, it feels that way too But in the wider field of being, giving does not always look like participation. It can look like allowing. Like trusting the container itself. For years, I kept the Zendo doors open at BDG on Thursday evenings and Sunday mornings, setting up the cushions, lighting the incense, and sitting — whether anyone came or not. I never asked for RSVPs. I just came. And sometimes no one else showed up. But I was never disappointed. I sat anyway — not as a performance, and not needing anyone to see — but because the container itself deserved to be held. I sat not alone, but with the quiet presence of those who might come, or who couldn’t come, or who didn’t know they were already included. I sat as a way of keeping the ember burning, trusting that the field was already whole, even if the room was empty. And over time, I came to see that this, too, was a kind of clean giving. Not because the Zendo needed me to sit there — but because the act of holding the space, regardless of who showed up, was an offering to the larger field itself. The room was never truly empty. The space was being held, and I was held by the space. This kind of giving does not aim itself at a particular person or group. It is not about confirming a bond or ensuring that the giving will be met. It is an offering to the whole. Clean giving does not require the recipient to see it. However, the reflex to seek validation in mutuality is so deeply wired that giving as an offering — with no “you” giving and no “someone” receiving, only the gift itself — can feel like absence, or worse, abandonment. But the field of life does not require our presence as an identity to remain whole. Clean giving trusts this. It lets the field hold things without our reinforcement or our centering. This is not to say that mutuality is unimportant. It is. And yet Naikan invites us to practice noticing that mutuality is not the only way giving flows. Sometimes, the most generous act is to allow the larger field to hold things, while we quietly tend to ourselves and others from the side. It is not absence. It is a different form of presence.
The Meal Verse – Receiving and Giving Without Contract
Before meals in Zen practice, we chant words that many of us know by heart: “We reflect on the effort that brought us this food and consider how it comes to us.” These words are not a prayer. They are a remembering. They call us to see what is already true: that this food did not appear by magic, nor by our deserving, nor even by our asking. It arrived through the labor of others — seen and unseen, near and far. Farmers, harvesters, drivers, clerks, cooks, compost, air, the earth itself. And behind them, countless more. When we chant these words, we are not making a deal with the food. We are not saying, — “Because I see you, I am entitled to you.” We are placing ourselves, consciously, inside the vast web that brought the food to us. We are naming the field of giving and receiving that is always present, whether we notice it or not. We do not owe the food our performance. But we owe it our attention—because we have the capacity to notice. This is why, in Zen, even the act of eating is a form of giving. We receive the gift of the food, and by fully receiving it — by tasting it, being with it, letting it nourish us — we give ourselves back to the world, not as consumers, but as part of the ongoing life of this earth. Our bodies, fed by the food, become vessels of care. Our breath, made possible by this meal, becomes a gift to those we meet. Dōgen Zenji once said that to be fully present in each moment is to offer your whole body and mind to that moment, and in doing so, the moment offers itself back to you. There is no separation between giver, receiver, and gift. It is all one movement. When we were infants, this was already true. Our mother’s milk. Her arms. Her body feeding ours. She gave. We received. And in receiving, we gave her the gift of continuing the ancient bond between mother and child. We didn’t need to know this. We were already participating in the field. Avalokiteshvara, the bodhisattva of compassion, is not far away or abstract. She is the mother feeding us. She is the hands that made the bowl. She is the breath that comes after the meal, reminding us that we are still here, still part of the whole. When you eat, can you feel yourself as all three? Receiver. Giver. Gift. No part missing.
~ End ~

This Week’s Intention This week, we invite gentle attention to the second Naikan question: What did I give today? Giving is not always something we do. It is also something we allow. Sometimes giving looks like showing up, offering words, offering help. Sometimes it looks like restraint, holding back, stepping aside, trusting the field itself to hold what needs to be held. There are times when we give by tending to our own well-being because it is what keeps the field open and alive for others, too. There are times when no one sees your giving. That does not make it less real.
Daily Reflection Practice Each evening, pause for a few minutes. In a notebook, on your phone, or just in your heart, reflect on these two questions: • What did I receive today? • What did I give today? Include the small, the subtle, the invisible. Include the ways you gave to others, and the ways you gave to yourself. Include the times you let the world hold itself without inserting yourself.
Optional Practice: Relational Gratitude When you eat a meal this week, try letting yourself feel all three at once: Receiver: The food, the labor, the care that brought this meal to you. Giver: The act of receiving itself is already giving — becoming part of the flow of life that continues beyond you. Gift: Your life, made possible by this food, continuing into the next breath, the next moment. No part missing.
Final Thought Giving is not always seen. Receiving is not always acknowledged. And yet, the flow continues — whether we notice it or not.
Curious to keep going?
The next reflection in  Naikan in Four Movements  is:
What I Couldn't Undo ⧉ 
(Each piece stands alone. There’s no need to read in order.)
 Noticing What Holds You ⧉ 
 What Flows Without Return ⧉ 
 What I Couldn't Undo ⧉ 
 The Rhythm of Vow ⧉ 

For orientation beyond this page, you may enter through:
The Vibrating Thread: From the Field of Redibility
Naikan in Four Movements
Threadwork (or begin with  Threshold to Threadwork ⧉  for a gentler entry)
The Holding Vow Sutra (drawn from the arc of  Naikan: The Rhythm of Vow ⧉ , but arriving later)

Comments